American women don’t need Planned Parenthood | The Washington Times

Posted on

American women don’t need Planned Parenthood | The Washington Times.

A very good article.  Well-written, statistical, and a careful analysis of what PP actually does with their time and space.

Investigate, Congress.  That’s $360 million in taxpayer funds that need to go somewhere else.

Town Clerk refuses to sign Gay Marriage Licenses |

Posted on

Rights Clash as Town Clerk Rejects Her Role in Gay Marriages –

If more people actually stood up for what they supposedly believed in like this lady has, we wouldn’t be in this position to begin with.

Also, who the heck named this article?  Biased much?  (My title is my own writing- the linked title is their version.)

Thoughts on “Ranks of hungry children swell, worrying doctors – The Boston Globe” [ALSO: Ending Childhood Hunger]

Posted on Updated on

Ranks of hungry children swell, worrying doctors – The Boston Globe.

“The emergency room survey found a similarly striking increase in the percentage of families with children who reported they did not have enough food each month, from 18 percent in 2007 to 28 percent in 2010.

BMC has also seen a 58 percent increase, from 24 in 2005 to 38 in 2010, in the number of severely underweight babies under the age of 1 who were referred by family physicians to its Grow Clinic, where doctors provide intensive nutritional, medical, and other services to boost babies’ growth. Such malnourishment is similar to what is more typically seen in developing countries, Sandel said.

While the nation’s spotlight has been trained on the other end of the spectrum, the problem of childhood obesity, Pérez-Escamilla and other researchers report evidence that early hunger may be linked to later obesity. […] Some studies have found that young children who grow up with not enough to eat can become overweight or obese adolescents and adults, though the link is not firmly established.”

A tragic story.  It is not just the unemployed that are hit by the recession, it is their children, too ….

There is a huge Presidential initiative to end childhood hunger in America, the National Anti-Hunger Organization (NAHO), which, in itself is a worthy ambition, but after reading the key suggested points for doing so (their projected goal is ending childhood hunger by 2015 [pdf]), this is no real solution.

The main points of this plan are nine, some of which I agree with:

1) Create economic growth that provides opportunity for all


2) Increase the minimum wage.

Nope. The minimum wage is established state-to-state based on what they know they can afford; not every state is bankrupt like the federal government.  The minimum wage is a starting point, an entry level pay bracket that is not meant to sustain a certain lifestyle or an entire family for an extended period of time.  The personal initiative of moving out of this pay bracket is what should prompt an increased lifestyle of living, not an increased minimum wage.

3) Establish a tax system that helps families thrive. (i.e. Child Tax Credit and Earned Income Tax Credit).


4) Improve key supports to help families with children meet their basic needs (affordable housing, strengthen Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, low-wage child care programs, unemployment insurance, protecting families with a disabled member)

Well, look at this .  More spending….?  How is that going to sustain familial support in a long-run scenario?  This is a great right-now, temporary fix, but my hesitation in approving this stems from its precedents; it won’t be temporary, nor do I feel it is intended to be.  So, unless a ‘temporary’ clause, with a solid exit “weaning” strategy comes along, I have to say ‘Nope’.

5) Ensure access to affordable, quality healthcare

Yep. Stipulation: It should not be provided by the federal government. More federal spending =/= Sustainable economy

6) Increase access to and participation in the federal nutrition program

Nope. I really think I’m sounding like a broken record here, but there is just no way increasing federal spending and familial dependence on the funds released is going to produce any lasting results.  The permanent answer to childhood hunger is not increasing food assistance programs.  It is the first point; economic growth that provides opportunity for all.

7) Expand federal nutrition program eligibility to reach all food-insecure children

Nope. …….. How is expanding a federal assistance program going to stimulate the economy so parents can provide for their children?  How is expanding the horizons of federal spending going to help ANYONE? The temporary result may be that a child does not go hungry, but the lasting result is a failed economy and as a result a failed government; we face a collapsed nation and a scenario where no one can help anyone else, because our country does not exist anymore.

8.) Ensure that children have not only enough food but enough nutritious food

YES. Yes.  Other suggestions; American farming initiatives and incentives to grow healthy food by Americans that will stay in America…. not too familiar with the farming industry to be able to fully comment on what’s in place now and what can be changed, but I do know enough to know that we import way too much of our food…. we need to stop processing and start growing.

9) Provide the leadership required to reach the 2015 goal

This is just a shameless campaign plug for Obama. I don’t agree with the major points of this initiative and therefore don’t agree with the administration that suggested it, though I do believe the cause is a worthy one.  They have just gone about it in a way that will provide immediate results that will not stand the test of time and will ultimately cause more problems than they have solved …. this initiative has the right motive, but their method is wrong.  I think a federal initative is the wrong move.  The economy is the key to everything.  More jobs = more employment = less childhood hunger.  A simple solution, a much more difficult implementation.

Side note …… “Don’t bite the hand that feeds you” takes on a totally different meaning when the government is the one doing the feeding …. socialist state, anyone?

I do have a point to all of this.  I do know where I’m going and what I want to ultimately say …. which is that Public funding will never be able to care for the sick and ailing like private charity can.  Look at the current federal financial crisis.  How is that going to get any better by spending more money???  It is unfortunate, but families cannot depend on government assistance forever.  For a time, sure.  That’s what it’s there for.  I can understand that, I think anyone can.  But it has gotten to the point that unfortunately, families that truly need it cannot depend on it much, or at all, because the system has been exploited for so long and is about to go bankrupt with the rest of the country.  What is the answer? Private charity.


  • The St. Vincent de Paul Society is founded on the initiative of feeding the hungry, giving drink to the thirsty, and clothing the naked, three of the Seven Corporal Works of Mercy as taught in the Catholic Church. There is a SVDP chapter in every major city and they are always in need of volunteers and donations and financial assistance.
  • Visit Share Our Strength’s website, for ideas on getting involved in the food bank in your community, as well as other initiatives that can help parents who are struggling to feed their children well.

Thoughts on: “New Doll Coming To The U.S. Teaches Girls How To Breast Feed | CBS New York”

Posted on Updated on

Thoughts on: “New Doll Coming To The U.S. Teaches Girls How To Breast Feed | CBS New York”.

…. I don’t think I am alone in expressing concern that this even exists, let alone on the way to U.S. shelves?

One quote from the article raised an eyebrow, though: “Scott from Manhattan says he wouldn’t buy the doll, but gives credit to the company for coming up with the idea. “Make a product, if it sells, it sells,” he said.”

I’m as big a proponent of Capitalism as the next person, (well, moreso, probably…), but this doesn’t constitute good psychological health for the person who invented it, the manufacturers who made it, or the parents who buy this for their children.  Some things happen naturally in a girl’s life; 9 year olds learning to breast-feed their baby dolls is not one of them, though.

It’s hard enough to be a little girl growing up in this world without crazed entrepreneurs trying to cash in on it.  This story still just strikes me as bizzare.  Though, it’s also interesting in light of the increased rate of abortions worldwide, particularly in Spain where this doll was manufactured.  In Spain, the abortion rate has risen consistently every year since 1987, with the exception of a .4% decrease in 2003 (when Europe suffered from a massive heat-wave that killed over 40,000 Europeans.).  The 2008 statistics, last year I’ve found available, are hovering at 18.2%, meaning 18 out of 100 pregnancies are aborted.  Currently the U.S. rate is 40% for unintended pregnancies and 22% overall, excluding miscarriages.  This means that 40 of 100 unintended pregnancies are aborted…. and 22 of every 100 pregnancies overall are aborted.  Perhaps Spain looks to the United States to see its future and are taking steps to avoid it.  Are they trying to make pregnancy and birth a more desirable outcome? If that is in fact the case (which itself causes pause to consider), I can admire the intent, but I still think this doll indicates they are going about it all the wrong ways.

† Prayer for the unborn † (taken from

O Mary, bright dawn of the new world,
Mother of the living,
to you do we entrust the cause of life:
Look down, O Mother, upon the vast numbers
of babies to be born,
of the poor whose lives are made difficult,
of men and women who are victims of brutal violence,
of the elderly and the sick killed
by indifference or out of misguided mercy.
Grant that all who believe in your Son
may proclaim the Gospel of life
with honesty and love to the people of our time.
Obtain for them the grace
to accept that Gospel as a gift ever new,
the joy of celebrating it with gratitude
throughout their lives
and the courage to bear witness to it resolutely,
in order to build,
together with all people of good will,
the civilization of truth and love,
to the praise and glory of God,
the Creator and lover of life.

~~ Pope John Paul II
Encyclical Letter “The Gospel of Life”
Given in Rome, on March 25,
the Solemnity of the Annunciation of the Lord,
in the year 1995.