Interested to see how this plays out.
“The ‘After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’ paper argues that the act wouldn’t be classed as euthanasia because the best interest of the foetus or newborn being killed is not necessarily the primary reason his or her life is being terminated. The authors state that after-birth abortion should be made legal and it should be permitted on the same grounds as abortion. They added that it wouldn’t be the same as infanticide.”
Thanks to MRI technology.
Some powerful words from the Washington Times.
“PRENDA or a bill like it will return in the next Congress and probably every subsequent one until it passes. It’s a useful tool for forcing abortion supporters to go on the record that killing babies is more important to them than preventing discrimination. Hopefully, some day, stopping the practice altogether will be the law of the land.”
“Eight percent of all babies in the womb who test positive for Down syndrome or a genetic anomaly survive and are born1. That means 92% of all babies who test positive are aborted. Ninety two percent never get a chance; reading that fact shook me to my core.”
Read the rest.