“Everyone is an expert today. Everyone. There are very few professions that we still respect. And by respect, I mean those whom I trust may know more than I do with regards to a specific discipline.
Now, I still believe in experts. And I believe in them because I know I can’t be an expert in everything. I simply don’t have enough time to read up on everything.
Early this morning I came up with two professions that I thought we still respected: doctors and lawyers. But as I sit here writing this meditation, I believe I am wrong with regards to doctors. I think we go to the doctors only as a last resort. Why? Because we think we know better. So, we Google our symptoms; we self-diagnosis; we self-prescribe and then we finally go in to see the doctor. When the doctor gives us our medication, we end up not following the instructions. Why? Because we think we know better.
The same holds true for God and the Church. We are like children. And just like children, we tend to put as much trust in God and the Church as a child puts in the wisdom and experience of his/her parents. Not much.
So who do we trust? Superstars! All kinds of them too: music stars, actors and actresses, billionaires and their wives, politicians and their children.”
He goes on to explain the difference in knowledge and wisdom, and dogma vs. propaganda…. worth the read.
This entry was posted in America, babies, birth control, budget, Catholicism, cohabitation, euthanasia, faith and morals, family, health & fitness, homosexuality, kids, marriage, minorities, motherhood, national security, Obama, parenting, religion, society, Texas, women and tagged abortion, abortion question, adoption, bishops, Catholic, catholicism, constitution, freedom of speech, HHS, HHS mandate, in utero, morality, planned parenthood, Pope Benedict XVI, pregnancy options, selective abortions, sex addiction, sex-selected abortions, unethical.
Most important parts:
“There is so much here that one thing is clear: there is no such thing as The Talk, singular.”
“This education has to begin at an early age, in an age-appropriate way. One reader sums it up this way: “5-year-olds need to understand what modesty is, and why our bodies need to be given an appropriate amount of respect. 7-year-olds need to be able to ask questions (and get answers) when they see “weird” magazine covers at the grocery store. 10-year-olds need to have some understanding of their biology. And so on. I don’t think there is an age that is too early to plant the seeds of modesty, purity, and chastity because it involves so much more than [sexual intercourse]. It is ultimately ordered to charity and the basic understanding that all people are created in the image and likeness of God.””
The whole article is worth the read.
This entry was posted in abortion, adolescence, babies, birth control, Catholicism, cohabitation, death, faith and morals, family, homosexuality, kids, marriage, men, motherhood, parenting, psychology, society, values, women, women's health and tagged abstinence-only, chastity, childhood, in utero, love, marriage, morality, parental rights, parenting, pornography, pregnancy options, relationships, vocation.
A very good article. Well-written, statistical, and a careful analysis of what PP actually does with their time and space.
Investigate, Congress. That’s $360 million in taxpayer funds that need to go somewhere else.
This entry was posted in abortion, America, babies, birth control, budget, education, family, kids, marriage, parenting, women's health and tagged abortion rate, advised abortion, child neglect, congressional hearings, illegal?, in utero, morality, planned parenthood, pregnancy options, senselssness, taxpayerfunds, unethical, US, washington times.
Canadian Mother Strangles Newborn, Gets No Jail Time and Judge Defends Infanticide By Comparing It to Abortion | TheBlaze.com
…… WHAT IS THIS WORLD COMING TO??!?!?!?!
This entry was posted in abortion, babies, death, euthanasia, faith and morals, family, international affairs, kids, parenting, psychology, society, values, women's health and tagged adoption, Canada, child neglect, childhood, illegal?, in utero, insanity, morality, parenting, patricide, senselssness, unethical.
“On Sunday, June 26, CNN aired a heart-breaking report, “Nepal’s Stolen Children.” The documentary, narrated by actress Demi Moore, told the story of Nepalese girls who were sold into slavery and turned into prostitutes in neighboring India. During the broadcast Moore broke down and cried and spoke about making sure this kind of thing never happens again. While no one can disagree with that, the problem is that we are ignoring an important part of what is driving this inhumane traffic in innocence. That “part” was the subject of a New York Times column the day after the broadcast. The title, “160 Million and Counting,” referred to the number of “missing” women in the world. Not “missing” as in “disappeared,” rather, as in “never born in the first place.”
While the practice of sex-selection abortion originated among the more affluent, it eventually spread down the social ladder. And this brings us back to the tragedy in Nepal. The impact of selective abortion goes beyond the lives ended in the womb, horrid as that is – it affects society. A 2008 article by two Loyola Law School professors found that by reducing the number of potential brides, selective abortion in India increased the demand for sex workers. And one way that “demand” is being filled is through the Nepalese girls featured in the CNN documentary. The “lucky” ones are “smuggled and purchased from poor countries like Nepal and Bhutan to be brides for Indian men.” The more unfortunate are sold into the Indian sex trade.”
The effects of messing with the natural order are far-stretched and felt in every area of society ….. impacting it in ways we are yet to imagine.
Pray for these girls and their families, and their cultures, that the birth of baby girls may once again become the joyous occasion it is meant to be.
This entry was posted in abortion, babies, birth control, death, faith and morals, family, international affairs, kids, minorities, parenting, psychology, society, values and tagged abortion question, child neglect, childhood, in utero, morality, parenting, pregnancy options, senselssness, sex-selected abortions, unethical.
“Cynthia Daily and her partner used a sperm donor to conceive a baby seven years ago, and they hoped that one day their son would get to know some of his half siblings — an extended family of sorts for modern times.
So Ms. Daily searched a Web-based registry for other children fathered by the same donor and helped to create an online group to track them. Over the years, she watched the number of children in her son’s group grow.
Today there are 150 children, all conceived with sperm from one donor, in this group of half siblings, and more are on the way. “It’s wild when we see them all together — they all look alike,” said Ms. Daily, 48, a social worker in the Washington area who sometimes vacations with other families in her son’s group.
Now, there is growing concern among parents, donors and medical experts about potential negative consequences of having so many children fathered by the same donors, including the possibility that genes for rare diseases could be spread more widely through the population. Some experts are even calling attention to the increased odds of accidental incest between half sisters and half brothers, who often live close to one another.
“My daughter knows her donor’s number for this very reason,” said the mother of a teenager conceived via sperm donation in California who asked that her name be withheld to protect her daughter’s privacy. “She’s been in school with numerous kids who were born through donors. She’s had crushes on boys who are donor children. It’s become part of sex education” for her.
Critics say that fertility clinics and sperm banks are earning huge profits by allowing too many children to be conceived with sperm from popular donors, and that families should be given more information on the health of donors and the children conceived with their sperm. They are also calling for legal limits on the number of children conceived using the same donor’s sperm and a re-examination of the anonymity that cloaks many donors.”
What kind of world do we live in that these are our problems??
What moral compass do we keep to allow things like this to happen??
How has this even become an “industry”, and how has it grown to this?
This entry was posted in abortion, adolescence, America, babies, faith and morals, family, health & fitness, kids, marriage, men, parenting, psychology, same-sex marriage, society, values and tagged childhood, genetic disorders, in utero, marriage, morality, parenting, pregnancy options, sperm banks, sperm donors, unethical.
Jennifer Fulwiler writes eloquently on the four questions that led her from mainstream feminism to the Catholic Church.
- Is Contraception Good For Women?
- How Does the Contraceptive Mentality Impact Women?
- Who stands up for all women?
- Who encourages women to seek information?
Her entire post is well worth the read, but I want to point particular attention to her last paragraph.
“Who encourages women to seek information? [The Catholic Church.]
Finally, I note that I’m always suspicious of any cause that is not comfortable with a free flow of information, especially when it involves withholding information from women. Notice that you never see secular feminists sites linking to videos of abortions. You never see pro-choice sites posting pictures of what, exactly, these “clumps of tissue” within the womb actually look like. You never see them encouraging women to research fetal development and learn things like the fact that whatever it is that’s within their wombs has a heartbeat at four weeks, fingerprints at 10 weeks, and fully formed genitals at 14 weeks. They even oppose bills requiring that women at abortion clinics have the option of seeing ultrasounds to find out what is going on in their bodies, on the grounds that it would make the women too emotional.
Hey, guys, Victorian England called. They want their view of women back.
The Catholic Church, on the other hand, respects women enough to tell them the full truth about human sexuality and human life. It never discourages them from gaining more information about their own bodies. It trusts them to be able to handle the truth, even if it’s not convenient.”
Seek all you want, the Truth is there to be found.
This entry was posted in abortion, babies, Catholicism, education, health & fitness, kids, women's health and tagged abortion question, in utero, Jennifer Fulwiler, mainstream feminism, pregnancy options.